February 4, 2012

NO BREES NO WIN

Steelers fans seem to be pretty optimistic about the Steelers’ chances in their first four games without Ben Roethlisberger.

Same goes for a lot of the media. I don’t know of anybody who is predicting anything worse than 2-2 and most seem to be looking at the quality of opponents and predicting 3-1 or 2-2.

Did you see the Saint-Vikings game last night?

How do you think the Saints would have done without Drew Brees?

Think they would have won? I don’t.

Would the results have been different if both Brees and Reggie Bush had been out? I think so.

The Steelers will not only be playing without Roethlisberger on Sunday. Remember, they’ll also be playing without Santonio Holmes–their most dangerous offensive weapon last year.

Dennis Dixon may turn out to be a pleasant surprise and maybe the combination of Dixon and Mike Wallace can come close to equaling Roethlisberger and Holmes.

I doubt it.

It rarely happens that way in the NFL.

FacebookShare

Related posts:

  1. STEELERS-GIANTS REAX
  2. 2010 NOT A GOOD YEAR TO BE A STEELERS QB
  3. WHY ONLY ONE STEELERS QB?
  4. BREAKING DOWN THE STEELERS SCHEDULE
  5. WILL THEY LET DENNIS BE DENNIS?

Leave a comment


Comments RSS TrackBack 15 comments