May 18, 2012

FORGET THE NFL DRAFT-WE’RE DOOMED

This is one of the most terrifying stories I’ve seen in a long, long time.

There’s a craze sweeping the country. Grown men are becoming obsessed with little toy ponies and a show called “My Little Pony.”

That’s right. While (you would hope) most men will be talking about the NFL draft, the Stanley Cup playoffs and maybe even the presidential election, there’s a growing group of men out there who are fascinated by an animated show intended for pre-school girls.

And, of course, the author of the story and the creator of the show think that this is a sign that men are evolving. In a good way.

“This might be a little short-sighted on my part, but I just assumed that any adult man who didn’t have a little girl wouldn’t even give it a try,” Faust said in a phone interview. “The fact that they did and that they were open-minded and cool enough and secure in their masculinity enough to embrace it and love it and go online and talk about how much they love it — I’m kind of proud.”

Faust brings up a good point. Aside from a few brony-haters, blessedly very little (negative) hay seems to get made over dudes liking something that’s “supposed to be for girls” (like, for example, the way girls would be side-eyed for liking Transformers in years past).

Despite a tacit understanding that some people might be surprised by their choice of entertainment, most bronies show little to no compunction about their fandom. They shouldn’t have to. And, intentionally or not, they might be bucking the gender socialization of things considered to be “for girls” or “for boys.”

The feminization of America continues.

There was a time when grown men playing with toys made for little girls would have a net thrown over them and be taken away to a really nice place with lots of really nice men in white coats.

Not to be judgmental.

 

 

FacebookShare

18 comments

SCOUTING THE STEELERS DRAFT

JOE BUTLER METRO INDEX

 

WEDNESDAY, APRIL 25, 2012

One pick at a Time

Interesting time of the year for the draftniks out there.  Who are the Steelers going to draft or who should the Steelers draft in the First Round.  The Steelers front office has done very well in their # 1 selections during the last decade.  Picking #24 leaves the door open for a pick that could surprise many Steelers fans. But it looks good that Alabama ILB Dont’a Hightower may be available at selection #24 Thursday night. And by the way, the Steeler faithful will be watching this draft closely like they have done in the past.  Rumor has it that the Baltimore Ravens may attempt to trade up and move ahead and choose Hightower before the Steelers make their selection.  It is just a rumor but it could happen.  Anyhow, what do the Steelers need?  Defensive Backs=Yes, Linebacker=Yes, Defensive linemen=Yes, Offensive Linemen=Yes, TE=No(with acquisition of Leonard Pope), Wide Outs=Maybe(depends on status of Mike Wallace), Running Backs=Maybe(depends on Mendenhall’s injury status), QB=No(not yet).  There are a lot of players I like in this draft that the Steelers can get in mid to late rounds but one they should consider maybe in the first round is Wichita Falls, TX Midwestern State U. OG/OT Amini Silatolu.  Only a Division 2 player, this guy physically reminds me of former Steeler Carlton Hasselrig.

Remember in the 2011 drfat, only 4 Division players were selected. Let’s take it one pick at a time.

 

FacebookShare

1 comment

WHAT NOW FOR THE PENGUINS

Here’s NHL.com’s Alan Robinson on the Penguins postmortem press conference today.

He’ll be my guest Wednesday at 1.00 on TribLive Radio.

 

http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=629520

FacebookShare

7 comments

GLOBAL WARMING RE-CONSIDERED

One of the major global warming alarmists is re-thinking his position.

Inconvenient

Via MSNBC:

James Lovelock, the maverick scientist who became a guru to the environmental movement with his “Gaia” theory of the Earth as a single organism, has admitted to being “alarmist” about climate change and says other environmental commentators, such as Al Gore, were too. Lovelock, 92, is writing a new book in which he will say climate change is still happening, but not as quickly as he once feared. He previously painted some of the direst visions of the effects of climate change. In 2006, in an article in the U.K.’s Independent newspaper, he wrote that “before this century is over billions of us will die and the few breeding pairs of people that survive will be in the Arctic where the climate remains tolerable.”

However, the professor admitted in a telephone interview with msnbc.com that he now thinks he had been “extrapolating too far.”

…[the new book] will also reflect his new opinion that global warming has not occurred as he had expected.

“The problem is we don’t know what the climate is doing. We thought we knew 20 years ago. That led to some alarmist books – mine included – because it looked clear-cut, but it hasn’t happened…The climate is doing its usual tricks. There’s nothing much really happening yet. We were supposed to be halfway toward a frying world now…The world has not warmed up very much since the millennium. Twelve years is a reasonable time… it (the temperature) has stayed almost constant, whereas it should have been rising — carbon dioxide is rising, no question about that,” he added.

He pointed to Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth” and Tim Flannery’s “The Weather Makers” as other examples of “alarmist” forecasts of the future.

In 2007, Time magazine named Lovelock as one of 13 leaders and visionaries in an article on “Heroes of the Environment,” which also included Gore, Mikhail Gorbachev and Robert Redford.

Good to see that Mr. Chernobyl made the cut.

But back to Lovelock…

…Asked if he was now a climate skeptic, Lovelock told msnbc.com: “It depends what you mean by a skeptic. I’m not a denier.”

He said human-caused carbon dioxide emissions were driving an increase in the global temperature, but added that the effect of the oceans was not well enough understood and could have a key role.

“It (the sea) could make all the difference between a hot age and an ice age,” he said.

He said he still thought that climate change was happening, but that its effects would be felt farther in the future than he previously thought.

“We will have global warming, but it’s been deferred a bit,” Lovelock said.

’I made a mistake’.  As “an independent and a loner,” he said he did not mind saying “All right, I made a mistake.” He claimed a university or government scientist might fear an admission of a mistake would lead to the loss of funding.

You think?

 

 

FacebookShare

40 comments

WHY VIOLENCE IN SPORTS SELLS

Ever notice the response when a  Steeler or  a Penguin lays out an opposing player?

Fans love it.

Despite all the talk about concussions and life changing injuries, fans are still watching the games.

Maybe that’s because, even if some of us won’t admit it, we like violence.

John Allemang of the Toronto Globe and Mail pointed out in a column that, despite all the violence and all the suspensions handed out during the first round of the NHL playoffs –ratings are way up.

(He’ll be a guest on my talk show today at 1:30 on TribLive Radio.)

Ottawa Senators' Chris Neil (24) takes a punch in the face from Boston Bruins' Milan Lucic during first period NHL preseason hockey action in Ottawa Friday September 25, 2009. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Fred Chartrand - Ottawa Senators' Chris Neil (24) takes a punch in the face from Boston Bruins' Milan Lucic during first period NHL preseason hockey action in Ottawa Friday September 25, 2009. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Fred Chartrand | CP 

Enlarge this image

JOHN ALLEMANG

Sports violence is within us all

JOHN ALLEMANG

From Saturday’s Globe and Mail

It’s a truth that’s impossible to deny as the bodies are carried off the NHL’s battlegrounds: Violence may be denounced and disallowed in the rest of our lives, but in hockey it remains a primal pleasure.

Fans love the thundering hit, especially in the playoffs when the stakes are raised, the referees back off, and the emotional level of a high-energy game is constantly on the boil. TV ratings are up by 50 per cent on TSN and NBC, and it’s hard not to see a connection with the bad-tempered side of the grinding Stanley Cup quest that has even the recently concussed SidneyCrosby throwing punches and trading insults.

New York Rangers goalie Henrik Lundqvist misses the game winning goal by Ottawa Senators' Kyle Turris during sudden death overtime of game four of first round NHL Stanley Cup playoff hockey action at the Scotiabank Place in Ottawa on Wednesday, April 18, 2012. The Senators defeated the Rangers 3-2. The two teams meet again on Saturday night. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick 

The NHL has suspended Chicago Blackhawks defenceman Duncan Keith five games for an illegal hit on Vancouver’s Daniel Sedin. REUTERS/Brian Snyder

“That’s really playoff hockey, isn’t it,” Philadelphia Flyers coach Peter Laviolette said after Crosby took on Philadelphia’s star player, Claude Giroux.

Cross-checks to the throat, heads crushed into the glass, punches traded by guys who are usually content to let lesser teammates play the goon role: This is all part of the heightened emotion and physical drama that the NHL promises fans and advertisers in the postseason.

“It’s adrenalin,” said Brian Burke, the Toronto Maple Leafs’ general manager famous as a proponent of on-ice belligerence, truculence and intimidation. In the heat of the moment, players can’t help themselves, or so the argument goes, and hockey fans are the beneficiaries: We watch with fascination to see what kind of carnage comes next.

Then a Marian Hossa is laid out flat by a professional NHL headhunter, and the blood lust takes a brief pause. Maybe the sight of highly paid gladiators savaging each other isn’t such a pure pleasure after all?

Introspection about violence in contact sports is a fleeting thing, and not just because the games would disappear if we took away the basic element of aggression. The larger issue sports fanatics are trying to evade is this: Who knows what we’d learn about ourselves by confronting the fact that other people’s suffering makes us happy?

“Moral outrage about sports violence comes and goes in fits and starts,” said Kevin Young, professor of sociology at the University of Calgary.

“We like to think we’re living in a society where violence is increasingly an anathema. So it might seem inconsistent with where we’re headed in a civilized culture for us to pay athletes to hurt other people and knock them out of the game. But that kind of reaction is just naive: This is what conventional, orthodox North American sport has always been about.”

 

 

FacebookShare

11 comments

ANOTHER WASTED YEAR FOR THE PENGUINS

Make that two (maybe three) wasted years in a row for the Penguins.

Last season was wasted because of injuries and a first round knockout.

This season was wasted because, by the time the playoffs arrived, the team was as healthy as it had been in two years and it still fell flat in the first round.

Hockey players are in their prime in their late 20s.

The Penguins stars are a couple of years away from that and they have “only” one Stanley Cup to show for it.

This isn’t the way it was supposed to work. This group was –at the very least– expected to contend for Stanley Cups –plural.

They didn’t contend two years ago. They didn’t contend last season and they didn’t contend this season.

It may be a little early to blow this group up but it’s definitely not too early to do some serious tweaking.

Ray Shero has a lot of work to do this summer. He has contracts and the salary cap to deal with and he has to decide what this team needs to do to become a better playoff team.

Nobody is going to care if the Penguins win the President’s Trophy next year.

So, whatever Shero does or doesn’t do between now and training camp in September won’t be able to be judged until next May.

It may be too early to call for the firing of Dan Bylsma and his staff but I think he would be the first to admit that his honeymoon ended at about 3:30 on Sunday.

FacebookShare

WATCH THIS

As I used to say in a former life….Watch This.

Discuss.

FacebookShare

26 comments