(The great Thomas Sowell)
It bothers me a little when conservatives call Barack Obama a “socialist.”
He certainly is an enemy of the free market, and wants politicians and bureaucrats to make the fundamental decisions about the economy. But that does not mean that he wants government ownership of the means of production, which has long been a standard definition of socialism.
What President Obama has been pushing for, and moving toward, is more insidious: government control of the economy, while leaving ownership in private hands. That way, politicians get to call the shots, but, when their bright ideas lead to disaster, they can always blame those who own businesses in the private sector.
Politically, it is heads-I-win when things go right, and tails-you-lose when things go wrong. This is far preferable, from Obama’s point of view, since it gives him a variety of scapegoats for all his failed policies, so that he no longer has to use President Bush as a scapegoat all the time.
Government ownership of the means of production means that politicians also own the consequences of their policies, and have to face responsibility when those consequences are disastrous — something that Barack Obama avoids like the plague.
Advertisement
Thus the Obama administration can arbitrarily force insurance companies to cover the children of their customers until the children are 26 years old. Obviously, this creates favorable publicity for President Obama. But if this and other government edicts cause insurance premiums to rise, then that is something that can be
COMMENTS 22 EXPAND © National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved. |










There’s not much difference between Hitler, Stalin, or Mussolini. And the ecomomic philosophy of the modern elected Democrat is very similar to theirs. This whole “left/right” analogy makes socialism and facism seem like polar opposites. In reality, they’re very similar. A more accuarate analogy would be the face of a clock. The socialist would be around 7, the facist about 5, and the modern elected Democrat coming in around 6. The conservative/Jeffersonian/libertarian/republican would be the polar opposite at the 12:00 postition. It would IMO be accurate to label any recent/current elected liberal Democrat a facist, or a socialist.
There’s an entire chapter of Hayek’s “Road to Serfdom” illustrating the similarites between fascism and socialism. And consider that was written when both of those terrible philosophies were new and fashionable in Europe.
I’ve been saying this for years now that it’s just like Hitler and the brown shirts in the 30′s & 40′s, only now instead of brown shirts they wear Armani suits!
Oh look, Hitler comparisons. How intellectual.
And yet some people wonder why the Tea Party is a laugh factory for every single late-night show in America.
Are you trying to say with your sarcastic “intellectual” comment that Obama isn’t a big government, central planning socialist? That’s ridiculous. If he could have gotten it through congress, he would have the federal government owning GM. He couldn’t, so he settled for swindling the bondholders to benefit his union supporters. Speaking of intellectuals, how does Jay Leno making wise cracks about tea party types make Obama less of a facist/communist/socialist? I think he’s the spawn of Lucifer himself, but I can’t show evidence for that. But the socialist part is well documented.
No, I’m saying you’re a stooge for using Hitler as a comparison to anything.
I saw a bumper sticker this morning that made me think of Obama and others like him in government.
The only difference between the government and the mafia is the mafia turns a profit.
——————————————————————————-
And in other news NY may not stop at soft drinks but may include movie popcorn and milk. What’s worse is 46% of NY city residents support it. Why doesn’t the government just come feed us and tuck us into bed at night while they’re at it?
http://www.myfoxny.com/story/18774940/health-panel-talks-about-wider-food-ban
They start messing with movie popcorn and I have a real problem. The arrogance o these busybodies is stunning.
Well, he’s going to Cleveland to play the blame game on jobs. Really, does anyone want to hear the guy whine about how things are everyone else’ fault at this point?
His administration has had arguably, one of the worst 2-3 weeks since he’s been president, and that is saying something. He’s got Bill Clinton contradicting everything he says for god’s sake. He and Axelrod are throwing darts at Romney and praying anything sticks.
I think this guy can expect two votes this election, his and poster Dan (who believes that Obama was the most compromising president of ALL TIME in his first two years)
Honey, the toast is burning…..
T O A S T
“Really, does anyone want to hear the guy whine about how things are everyone else’ fault at this point?”
Funny. Most people agree with him. Mostly because of things called facts.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/155177/Americans-Blame-Bush-Obama-Bad-Economy.aspx
He’s toast.