If you refer to Barack Obama as a socialist, you stand a really good chance of being called a moron, a radical, or a racist. Probably all three.

Stanley Kurtz is an author and a contributor to National Review. He’s also an investigative reporter.

If what he knew about Obama had been made public by the mainstream media in 2008, Obama would have lost in a landslide.

But the media were too busy sniffing around Wasilla, Alaska to find out the relationship between Sarah Palin and her librarian.

I had Kurtz on my radio show a few times. He is not a knuckle-dragging stereotypical right wing, bomb throwing birther.

I brought him on my KDKA radio show to talk about the roadblocks that were being put in his way as he tried to investigate Obama’s record in Chicago politics. Compare the number of stories you saw or heard about Kristol Palin’s baby compared to the number of stories done on the Annenberg Challenge.

Never heard of if? Kurtz wrote about it a lot during the 2008 campaign and had trouble finding anybody who didn’t work for Fox News to listen to him.

Kurtz has a new book that is a result of two years of research into Obama’s past and his serious socialist sympathies.

I said on the radio in the Summer of 2008 that there was no way that Barack Obama could be elected president. I made the mistake of assuming that the media would actually take a serious look at his background. They never did because they were in the tank for him at hello.

The piece in National Review has enough damaging evidence to make it impossible for Obama to be re-elected but, unless the dinosaur media let him tell his story, he’ll just be preaching to the choir.

Obama has been secretive and dishonest about his past. He’s the closest thing that we’ve ever had to a Manchurian Candidate and….yeah..he is a socialist.

With a capital “S”.